Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  61 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

The US-Israel Legal Review 2019 61

Guidelines. The circular provides an exemption from

preparing a transfer pricing study where specific

prices/rates are being applied (in the example above,

a price for an LRD with 3% to 4% Return on Sales

will be accepted by the ITA without presenting a

study). As per the later circular (i.e., transfer pricing

aspects following a business restructuring), the

ITA automatically views any transfer of FAR as a

business restructuring that must adhere to the arm’s

length principal. This subject is still in dispute among

experts in the field. Furthermore, it is worthwhile to

note that the ITA circulars express the ITA opinion,

but they do not bind the taxpayers.

A fourth circular depicts the ITA’s interpreta-

tion on intercompany loan treatment. According to

the ITO, a loan that was given by an Israeli compa-

ny to its foreign controlled subsidiary is excluded

from the arm’s length principal as long as the loan

meets certain conditions, including: not bearing

interest and linkage differential, having at least

a 5-year maturity and it is subordinated to other

debts. The circular clarifies the provision’s con-

ditions, and its applicability when parties to the

transaction are reversed (i.e., when a loan is given

by a foreign company to its related, controlled Is-

raeli company).

FOREIGN TAX-”TRANSPARENT” ENTITIES

Tax Reliefs and ITA Circular:

In general, a foreign

entity with the characteristics of a corporation, will

be treated as a company for Israeli tax purposes

and therefore will be liable for tax at the corporate

level, even though it is considered a “transparent

entity” for tax purposes in its place of residence.

For example, US LLCs and S Corporations are

generally treated as corporations for tax purposes

in Israel. Further, from an Israeli tax perspective,

the taxation of an LLC’s Israeli interest holders is

neither regulated nor clear. Notwithstanding the

above, according to an Israeli tax circular published

by the ITA in 2004, in certain circumstances there

is a special tax mechanism applicable with respect

to foreign tax credits of an Israeli tax resident who

holds interest in a US LLC which is treated in the

US as a pass-through entity. The circular allows the

Israeli taxpayer to elect to look through the LLC

for Israeli tax purposes and to therefore attribute

the LLC’s taxable income to the Israeli interest

holder; however, this is done only for the purpose of

allowing the shareholder to receive a tax credit in

Israel for taxes paid in the US. The circular explicitly

states that it is limited only to foreign tax credits,

and does not regard the LLC as a flow-through

entity for all tax purposes. The aforementioned

discussion raises other consequences, such as:

LLC classification as a controlled foreign company

(CFC), LLC’s tax residence classification using the

management and control status, etc.

Israel District Court Ruling:

During 2017 the Israel

District Court published a ruling which sheds some

light and elaborates on the taxation in Israel of a

US LLC, which is regarded as a pass-through entity

from a US tax perspective. The court decision

validated the content of the ITA Circular from

2004, and ruled that the classification of a foreign

corporation with respect to its taxation in Israel

shall be in accordance with the tax laws of Israel.

Meaning, even in cases where a corporation is

regarded as a pass-through entity in another

country, it should be treated as an opaque entity

from an Israeli tax perspective. This means that

an Israeli tax resident who holds interests in the

LLC shall not be entitled to tax credit in Israel on

the taxes paid in the US on the LLC’s income if such

income is treated as a dividend in Israel.

In a district court ruling, published recently, the

court decision emphasises once again the circular

approach that for Israeli tax purposes LLC is con-

sidered as a pass-through entity only for tax credit,

and therefore a shareholder of several LLCs cannot

offset LLCs’ losses against different LLCs’ profits.

The LLCs’ losses and profits do not pass-through

to the individual and should be treated within the

LLCs as separate opaque entities.

CORPORATE MERGERS AND DIVISIONS

In general, according to the provisions of the

ITO, mergers, splits, transfers of assets and

shares transfers within a group of companies

are considered taxable events under the ITO

provisions. However, a tax deferral may be granted,

provided certain conditions are met. In recent

years there have been a few legislative changes

allowing companies to ease the process of their

restructuring. In this respect, it is worthwhile

mentioning the shortening of the “Required

Period” (in which the participating shareholders