Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

The US-Israel Legal Review 2019 73

substantially limited an employer’s ability to

prevent or intervene in any initial unionisation, thus

facilitating the unionisations attempts.

ARE THERE SPECIFIC RULES REGARDING

EMPLOYEE/CONTRACTORCLASSIFICATION?

In principle, Israeli employment law applies only

to employees, and not to workers who are engaged

in other forms of engagement. Therefore, it is

essential to determine the status of engagement

of each specific worker. However, this task is

not always easy, for the following reasons: (i)

there is no statutory global definition of the term

“employee” (rather only specific definitions for

specific legislation); and (ii) this is a question of

status, and as such not subject solely to the parties

contractual agreement, and open to judicial review,

and possible re-classification.

When examining the engagement of an

independent contractor, the courts will examine

the individual’s integration into the employer’s

business (the employer’s control and supervision

overtheworker,workhours,location,theemployer’s

power to give the worker instructions; how central

and vital the work performed by the worker is to

the employer’s overall activity; etc.) and whether

the worker carries out an independent enterprise

of his/her own (whether the worker concurrently

provides services to others; is required to perform

the services personally; etc.)

The key exposure for a company in classifying

(and paying) a worker as an independent contractor

– is that, it can later be argued (whether by the

worker itself or by any other third party, such as

the tax authorities) that the worker is in fact an

employee of the Company, despite the express terms

of the engagement documents; and that theworker is

therefore entitled to a range of employment benefits

which were not previously received during the term

of the relationship, which would be calculated based

on the worker’s (usually higher) compensation as an

independent contractor.

No contract can completely remove the risk

of reclassification; however, there are certain

contractual provisions, recognised by the labour

courts, which if inserted into the services agreement,

may reduce the financial risks associated with such

re-classification. Such provisions include a clause

which provides for an agreed-upon alternative

salary (which is lower than the services fee) in case

the worker is re-classified as an employee, a set-off

and reimbursement mechanism, as well as a set of

declarations on the worker’s behalf which stipulate

that the worker requested not to be engaged as

an employee of the company and that he/she

acknowledges all of the consequences of such status.

We note that there are exposures also in

relation to engagements with manpower and

service contractors, in relation to identifying the

employer in the triangular relationship between

the worker, the manpower agency or services

contractor and the company/organisation to whom

the employment services are being provided (the

Actual User

”). The identity of the employer is not

determined solely by the way in which the parties

contractually define their relationship, but is rather

open to judicial review.

According to the Manpower Contractors Law,

5756 – 1996 (the “

Manpower Law

”), after a

manpower employee (other than a manpower

employee engaged in a computerisation position as

defined in the Manpower Law) has been engaged

to provide services via an employment agency for

nine (9) months with the company/organisation to

whom the employment services are being provided

(the “

Actual User

”), he/she will automatically

transfer, and become the direct employee of the

Actual User. In addition, the worker’s seniority as

an employee of the manpower agency will be taken

into account when calculating his/her seniority

with the Actual User.

ARE ANY TERMS IMPLIED INTO

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN ISRAEL?

Extensive employment legislation lays out the

mandatory entitlements to employment terms

In principle, Israeli employment

law applies only to employees,

and not to workers who are

engaged in other forms of

engagement.