Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  75 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 75 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

The US-Israel Legal Review 2019 75

provides legal protection to trade secrets. The law

provides that theft of a trade secret is a civil tort that

may entitle the plaintiff to several types of remedies,

for example: injunction, monetary compensation,

including statutory damages of up to NIS 100,000,

without having to prove that damages were caused,

and seisure of property. The employee’s obligation

to preserve the employer’s trade secrets also results

from an employee’s duties of good faith towards the

employer, which are recognised by case law.

In addition to the protection provided by the law,

the employer may increase the level of protection

through contractual means. In employment

contracts in Israel, it is very common to find

provisions relating to the employee’s obligations

regarding nondisclosure, noncompetition and

protection of intellectual property. Furthermore,

there are companies that adopt security procedures

that may assist to prevent the theft of trade secrets.

From a practical aspect, it is recommended

that at the end of the employment relationship, the

employer should insist on receiving all the relevant

documents and data from the terminated employee

as well as ensuring that the employee has no access

to the employer’s computer systems (so that he/

she will not be able to steal trade secrets after the

termination of employment).

As a general rule, covenants not to compete

or solicit are rarely enforced in Israel. In general,

Israeli law prefers,

prima facie

, the employee’s

freedom of occupation over the employer’s right

that a former employee will not compete with

it. Accordingly, an employee is prohibited from

competing with a former employer only if such

competition may harm a legitimate interest of the

employer (such as the breach of trade secrets).

Israeli case law stipulates that non-compete

covenants incurred by employees will not be

enforced unless there are specific circumstances,

such as the following:

1. the former employer owns a trade secret that is

unlawfully used by the employee;

2. the former employer has invested unique and

valuable resources in the employee’s training;

3. upon termination of the employee’s employment

with the former employer, the employee received

special consideration in return for his or her non-

compete undertaking; and

4. when a balance between the extent of the

employee’s good faith in taking the new position

and the employee’s obligation of fidelity towards

his or her former employer indicates that the

enforcement of the employee’s non-compete

covenant can be justified.

In this respect, the courts will also consider the

position of the employee and the field in which the

employer operates.

The enforcement of the non-compete covenants

in section (2)–(4) above will only be upheld if the

employment contract includes an appropriate non-

compete covenant (while in the situation in section

(1), there may be a possibility to enforce the non-

compete covenant even in the absence of a non-

compete clause in the employment contract).

Naturally, as noted above, when the employee:

(a) is more senior; (b) was more exposed to the

former employer’s technology; and (c) received

higher compensation, then the likelihood of

enforcement increases (but only under very

exceptional circumstances).

In any event, even if a court decides to enforce a

non-compete covenant, the enforcement will only be

with respect to an obligation that can be considered

as reasonable in the scope of employee’s position,

time and geographical limitation. The court also has

the power to re-draft the non-compete obligation in

order to make it more reasonable.

n

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Orly Gerbi

established and now heads HFN’s

Labour & Employment Department, with over 20

years of experience in the field. Widely-regarded

as the leading employment law attorney in

Israel, Orly advises international and domestic

clients in the public and private sectors on all

aspects of labour and employment law and labour

relations, as well as employee benefits, executive

compensation, collective relations, pensions,

privacy and immigration.

CONTACT:

Orly Gerbi

T: +972 3 692 2045

E: gerbi@hfn.co.il

www.hfn.co.il