Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  13 / 120 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 120 Next Page
Page Background

/13/

agreements), certain horizontal arrangements (e.g., certain joint ventures) or other

types of arrangements (e.g., intragroup agreements). However, contracting parties'

ability to rely on these exemptions should be carefully reviewed, as most are subject

to requirements (including market share thresholds). Parties to an illegal restrictive

arrangement are exposed to potential criminal, administrative and civil sanctions.

Merger Transactions

Merger control law applies, among others, to the acquisition of the principal assets

of the target (including the acquisition of a line of business) or acquisition of more

than 25% of either the outstanding shares, voting rights, rights to appoint directors

or dividend rights of the target company. A merger must be notified to the IAA if

at least one of three thresholds is met (a turnover threshold, monopoly threshold

and merger-to-monopoly threshold). Failure to notify a merger exposes parties to

potential criminal, administrative and civil sanctions.

The IAA is granted an initial 30-day timeframe to reviewmergers,subject to extensions.

The IAA proposed a significant overhaul of merger control rules, which is still at a very

early legislative stage.

Monopolies

A firm is deemed a monopoly if it controls more than 50% of a relevant market. The

Commissioner is empowered to issue declaratory proclamations, which serve as

evidence sufficient to establish fact until proven otherwise (prima facie evidence) in

any legal proceeding that the firm in question is indeed a monopoly. Recently, the

IAA advocated for an amendment to the Antitrust Law, which would subject firms

possessing market power to the Antitrust Law's monopoly provisions even if their

market share falls short of 50%. This legislative initiative is still in its infancy.

The main monopoly prohibitions are refusal to deal and abuse of dominant position.

The latter consists of (a) a general prohibition on abusing dominant position in a

manner that may decrease competition or harm the public and (b) certain actions that

are considered per se abuses of monopoly position (e.g., predatory pricing, tying and

price discrimination). The IAA can issue directives to monopolies in order to prevent

potential harm to competition or the public.

Concentration Groups

In order tobetter combat lowcompetition in oligopolisticmarkets,the Israeli legislature

introduced a major revision to the Antitrust Law several years ago. The revision

authorizes the Commissioner to declare that a group of competitors dominating more

than 50% of a market are a "concentration group," provided that (a) there is limited

competition or there are conditions for limited competition between group members

and (b) there are remedies capable of preventing harm to competition or increasing

competition in the market. With this authority, the Commissioner can act as a super-

regulator of themarket and applymeasures needed to increase competition or prevent

further harm (e.g., decreasing barriers to entry or expansion by forbidding the use of

long-termcontracts, terminating facilitating practices like information exchanges). The

Antitrust Tribunal is authorized to issue more drastic instructions such as mandating

the divestment of holdings (even minority holdings) in a competing firm.

Additional Competition Legislation

While the majority of competition legislation resides within the Antitrust Law, there

is also legislation that deals with certain market characteristics and regulates specific

sectors.