Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

48 The US-Israel Legal Review 2019

ISRAEL: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

exports shows no sign of abating.

Similarly, recent regulatory reforms have

opened the door for Israeli cannabis producers

to export their product for medicinal purposes.

Strong bonds between the academic-medical

world and businesses in this area herald great

promise for an industry that has finally been let

off the leash. Within months of these regulatory

developments, eight M&A deals involving Israeli

cannabis firms were registered in 2018, the

majority of which involved existing companies

entering into mergers in an attempt to raise funds

and drive up valuations. However, the industry as

a whole remains somewhat controversial and as

such, companies hoping to take advantage of these

developments need to ensure that they are able to

navigate the additional regulatory requirements.

For example, companies hoping to cultivate and

export their product must receive approvals from

the Israeli Police and the Ministry of Health.

Moving beyond specific industries, it is also

important to consider what strategic decisions

Israeli companies are taking. Understanding trends

in the market and adapting accordingly will provide

investorswithanedgeinanaggressivelycompetitive

market, where even the smallest advantage can

make all the difference. The next section of the

article looks at some emerging trends that we have

identified, and considers their significance.

MARKET TRENDS IN 2019

To start with, it is quite clear that the Israeli market

will continue to draw the interest of private equity

funds and VC’s, and that the resources available to

these institutions will continue to drive transaction

volume. Despite the rise in interest rates which

will affect returns, we believe debt is accessible

to financial and strategic acquirers at relatively

low rates (historically speaking) and with ‘light’

covenant packages. These factors will weigh into

strategic development considerations. For example,

the availability of funding has a negative effect on

IPO’s, and promotes M&A as the preferred route

for fund raising and exit strategy, a trend that has

been emerging for several years now. Even where

companies elect to go down the IPO route, they

consistently avoid the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange,

with all eight of the public offerings undertaken by

Israeli companies in 2018 occurring abroad.

Beyond the universal factors that push

companies towards the M&A route worldwide,

there are several factors which are particularly

relevant to companies considering undertaking

a public offering on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange,

such as burdensome corporate governance and

disclosure requirements, lower valuations (though

this depends on the nature of the company in

question), lower liquidity post IPO, as well as

intense and often highly-critical media coverage.

Second, the continued interest being shown by

Chinese funds in all sectors of the Israeli market is

likely to increase, despite growing unease by some

media commentators and government officials

of a ‘Chinese invasion’. In 2018, Chinese investors

participated in six of the seventeen largest funding

deals in Israel. However, investors must be wary of

the warnings from the influential Israeli security

complex which could lead to regulation restricting

such investments in particular industries, or could

even culminate in an ‘oversight mechanism’ which

would increase administrative and regulatory

burdens on investors and companies alike. These

concerns are most threatening to those sectors

that are already heavily regulated, such as financial

sectors, certain advanced technologies, and

infrastructure. Respectively, we may encounter

local regulatory limitations and restrictions

similar to those imposed by the Committee on

Foreign Investment in the United States. There

remains uncertainty as to whether such limitations

will indeed be implemented and become a reality,

but they should be considered as a potential hurdle

that may eventually need to be crossed, especially

in circumstances of involvement by Chinese funds

in heavily regulated sectors.

Third, when it comes to structuring deals we

believe we will see increased ‘bid transactions’

due to the significant competition between buyers,

combined with the increasing aspiration for sky-

high valuations. In light of the highly desirable

nature of many of the target companies in the

Israeli market, sellers find themselves in a position

of strength and leverage this to their advantage.

Sellers will negotiate with several buyers

simultaneously andwithout the desired exclusivity.

As such, in a market where buyers’ alertness and an

ability to move quickly has always been a valuable

asset, increased competition compounds this, and