Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

The US-Israel Legal Review 2019 49

familiarity with local institutions and bureaucracy

can be a decisive advantage. Starting due diligence

as early as possible, securing financing, and being

able to negotiate swiftly can all mean the difference

between closing headline-grabbing deals, and

going home empty handed. Furthermore, both

buyers and sellers must be wary of litigation risks

from disappointed bidders, and of break-up fees

and other undesirable ‘walk-away’ scenarios.

It is also important to emphasize that, although

the favored deal structure in Israel tends to be

the more traditional post-closing adjustment

mechanism(with terms that are generally favorable

to the selling side), we have been experiencing a

noticeable increase in deals that are structured in

accordance with the ‘Locked Box’ approach where

Warranty & Indemnity Insurance is purchased in

order to secure the business representations and

warranties provided by the seller.

Buyers and sellers in Israel will need to

seek advice and consider the advantages

and disadvantages of each of these types of

transactions. Factors to consider include (but are

certainly not limited to) price certainty, the time

period between the economic and legal transfer,

potential indemnification risks, and speed of

execution. Every transaction must have a tailor-

made strategy with regard to its nature and the

circumstances under which negotiations are taking

place. Choosing themost appropriate deal structure

is critical both in regard to protecting returns and

providing a workable framework within which

fruitful negotiations can take place.

ISRAELI M&A RELATED REGULATION AND

TAX DEVELOPMENTS

Whilst investor and company preferences certainly

affect the market, they are not determinative.

The Israeli regulator does not rest, and whilst

soundbites

trumpeting

reduced

regulation

abound, the regulator continues to set additional

boundaries. As important as market trends are,

without knowledge of the regulatory requirements

investors will find themselves frustrated and ruing

missed opportunities.

Of the recent developments in this field, it is

important to focus on two Guidelines recently

published by the Israeli Tax Authority (ITA) which

we view as particularly relevant to the M&A field.

In early 2018, the ITA issued guidelines that

clarified its position with respect to debt ‘push-

down’ as part of a reverse triangular merger.

According to the guidelines, debt push-down

will generally be deemed either a distribution

of dividends by the target company, or a capital

decrease, which will result in the target company

incurring tax liability. Thus, multinational

corporations acquiring Israeli companies through

reverse triangular mergers will not be able to avoid

tax by treating the cash provided to purchase the

target as a loan to the newly merged surviving

company. The guidelines also discuss when

payment of this tax becomes due, and whether the

cost of the debt-financing by the target company is

deductible. Therefore, whilst structuring deals as a

triangular merger or reverse triangular merger is

still common in Israel, the new guidelines are likely

to reduce debt push-downs and steer companies in

other directions. For example, acquirers will need

to consider creative alternative deal structures

with the aim of mitigating tax liability on revenue

upstream, which is required to service the

acquirer’s debt, such as issuance of redeemable

securities through the corporate holding structure.

The second notable area in which the ITA has

intervened, is in its scrutiny of Employee Stock

Ownership Plans (ESOP) during exits. This issue

demands the attention of both buyers and sellers

from the early stages of a transaction or, ideally,

from the early stages of adopting an ESOP plan in

view of a future exit event. The most recent ITA

guidelines confirmed that the regulator will not be

willing to consider options which vest only upon an

exit event as entitling ESOP participants to the tax

The Israeli market reflects

the trends unfolding on the

global stage, however, a close

understanding of the unique legal

and business environment in

Israel is a must.